The name asks a question. It does not pick a side.
We explain developments, link the evidence for factual claims and distinguish what happened in court from what people say about it afterward. We have no affiliation with the court, jurors, prosecution, defense or the Clancy family.
How this launch edition was made
The launch articles are AI-assisted summaries and explainers based on the linked reporting and legal reference material. We have not conducted original interviews, attended proceedings or obtained exclusive evidence for this edition. The organizational byline identifies the publication, not a claim of a staffed newsroom.
Our editorial standards
- Attribute claims. Allegations, testimony, recollections and judicial findings are identified as such.
- Separate coverage from analysis. Briefings, explainers and media analysis carry visible labels.
- Show the dates. Publication dates and the edition’s last fact-check date remain visible. Articles do not update themselves.
- Keep people’s dignity in view. Three children died. Their deaths and the family’s suffering are not treated as entertainment.
- Protect juror privacy. We do not solicit private juror identities, personal contact details or attempts to confront participants.
- Separate advertising. Paid placements must be labeled. Sponsors cannot buy a legal conclusion or favorable case coverage.
Corrections
Substantive corrections will be dated on the affected article with an explanation of what changed. No substantive corrections have been logged for this launch edition.
The publication’s contact channel is not yet open. Before public launch, a verified editorial inbox will be added here for corrections and inquiries.